Comments on: UFO http://googlesightseeing.com/2005/05/12/ufo/ Why bother seeing the world for real? Sun, 08 Nov 2009 07:48:29 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: James (admin) http://googlesightseeing.com/2005/05/12/ufo/comment-page-7/#comment-1715 James (admin) Wed, 18 May 2005 22:12:42 +0000 http://www.googlesightseeing.com/2005/05/12/ufo/#comment-1715 This thread is now closed as it is too large to manage! Please post new comments on the UFO Update thread: http://www.googlesightseeing.com/2005/05/18/ufo-update/ This thread is now closed as it is too large to manage!

Please post new comments on the UFO Update thread:

http://www.googlesightseeing.com/2005/05/18/ufo-update/

]]> By: Jeff Rubin http://googlesightseeing.com/2005/05/12/ufo/comment-page-7/#comment-1706 Jeff Rubin Wed, 18 May 2005 21:56:44 +0000 http://www.googlesightseeing.com/2005/05/12/ufo/#comment-1706 I think it's Glinda, the Good Witch of the North coming down to munchkin Land, to make sure that Dorthy will be not give up the Ruby slippers to the Wicked Witch Of The West. I think it’s Glinda, the Good Witch of the North coming down to munchkin Land, to make sure that Dorthy will be not give up the Ruby slippers to the Wicked Witch Of The West.

]]> By: Deepthroat Chakra http://googlesightseeing.com/2005/05/12/ufo/comment-page-7/#comment-1704 Deepthroat Chakra Wed, 18 May 2005 21:49:33 +0000 http://www.googlesightseeing.com/2005/05/12/ufo/#comment-1704 Nice link Derek Nice link Derek

]]> By: KairoAnnunaki http://googlesightseeing.com/2005/05/12/ufo/comment-page-7/#comment-1703 KairoAnnunaki Wed, 18 May 2005 21:49:04 +0000 http://www.googlesightseeing.com/2005/05/12/ufo/#comment-1703 Even though that's not it. That site rocks to some degree, thanks G.W.! Even though that’s not it. That site rocks to some degree, thanks G.W.!

]]> By: G W http://googlesightseeing.com/2005/05/12/ufo/comment-page-7/#comment-1701 G W Wed, 18 May 2005 21:39:18 +0000 http://www.googlesightseeing.com/2005/05/12/ufo/#comment-1701 ok people, stop looking at these, we will not tolerate wild conspiracy theorys www.infowars.com ok people, stop looking at these, we will not tolerate wild conspiracy theorys

http://www.infowars.com

]]> By: KairoAnnunaki http://googlesightseeing.com/2005/05/12/ufo/comment-page-7/#comment-1698 KairoAnnunaki Wed, 18 May 2005 21:28:35 +0000 http://www.googlesightseeing.com/2005/05/12/ufo/#comment-1698 I really honestly do not see how this can be a lens flare. At all. It doesn't seem right, at all, that it is a lens flare. I will be honest, I do not understand the physics behind lens flares. But I have worked with cameras and cam corders that have recieved all kinds of lens flares. But for this metallic orb, with a defined shape, and illumination on that shape from the reflecting off the side of this object as the direction of where the sun is. I can only see this as a particle. Or something that was shot up in the sky. How long as googlesightseeing been doing this? Why has this not occured BEFORE. Until May.. 13th? Right? Why have we not seen a weather balloon like this. Or a lens flare, ever, like this. Given it being every day, also. I really honestly do not see how this can be a lens flare. At all. It doesn’t seem right, at all, that it is a lens flare. I will be honest, I do not understand the physics behind lens flares. But I have worked with cameras and cam corders that have recieved all kinds of lens flares.

But for this metallic orb, with a defined shape, and illumination on that shape from the reflecting off the side of this object as the direction of where the sun is.

I can only see this as a particle. Or something that was shot up in the sky.

How long as googlesightseeing been doing this?

Why has this not occured BEFORE. Until May.. 13th? Right?

Why have we not seen a weather balloon like this. Or a lens flare, ever, like this. Given it being every day, also.

]]> By: Deepthroat Chakra http://googlesightseeing.com/2005/05/12/ufo/comment-page-7/#comment-1692 Deepthroat Chakra Wed, 18 May 2005 21:17:04 +0000 http://www.googlesightseeing.com/2005/05/12/ufo/#comment-1692 If you're just zooming up on the same hires image that gets resampled/resized according to the zoom, yes, the flare will resize along with everything else. The thing that makes a lens flare seem unlikely to me is the uniformity of appearance; except for a few images, it's a single circle. 'axial elongation' I believe, was the made up term. The sun does not appear to be low in the sky which would favor (methinks) a symmetric single flare in the center. A lens properly shrouded shouldn't show a flare, anyway, right? Surely these setups do not generate lens flares - it would be a crappy product and scrapped in favor of something that does better than a dime store disposable digital. Never have I seen a lens flare in photography of this nature. Never. But to see a kind that I've never seen in ANY photos before and to have them be so similar across so many shots... I don't think lens flare is it. If you’re just zooming up on the same hires image that gets resampled/resized according to the zoom, yes, the flare will resize along with everything else. The thing that makes a lens flare seem unlikely to me is the uniformity of appearance; except for a few images, it’s a single circle. ‘axial elongation’ I believe, was the made up term. The sun does not appear to be low in the sky which would favor (methinks) a symmetric single flare in the center.

A lens properly shrouded shouldn’t show a flare, anyway, right? Surely these setups do not generate lens flares – it would be a crappy product and scrapped in favor of something that does better than a dime store disposable digital.

Never have I seen a lens flare in photography of this nature. Never. But to see a kind that I’ve never seen in ANY photos before and to have them be so similar across so many shots… I don’t think lens flare is it.

]]> By: KairoAnnunaki http://googlesightseeing.com/2005/05/12/ufo/comment-page-7/#comment-1691 KairoAnnunaki Wed, 18 May 2005 21:15:58 +0000 http://www.googlesightseeing.com/2005/05/12/ufo/#comment-1691 Then that is one tiny lens flare for that lens. Then that is one tiny lens flare for that lens.

]]> By: Derek http://googlesightseeing.com/2005/05/12/ufo/comment-page-7/#comment-1690 Derek Wed, 18 May 2005 21:12:46 +0000 http://www.googlesightseeing.com/2005/05/12/ufo/#comment-1690 It would be in several places since these photos are assembled from several overlapping shots: This article has a good explaination of how it is done: http://www.esri.com/news/arcuser/1001/standup.html It would be in several places since these photos are assembled from several overlapping shots:

This article has a good explaination of how it is done:
http://www.esri.com/news/arcuser/1001/standup.html

]]> By: KairoAnnunaki http://googlesightseeing.com/2005/05/12/ufo/comment-page-7/#comment-1688 KairoAnnunaki Wed, 18 May 2005 21:08:29 +0000 http://www.googlesightseeing.com/2005/05/12/ufo/#comment-1688 Why would a lens flare be in several pictures, in difference sizes when you can zoom in and out. Shouldn't the lense flare be the same size on all the pictures? A lense flare can get re sized? Why would a lens flare be in several pictures, in difference sizes when you can zoom in and out. Shouldn’t the lense flare be the same size on all the pictures?

A lense flare can get re sized?

]]>