<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Biosphere 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://googlesightseeing.com/2005/05/23/biosphere-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2005/05/23/biosphere-2/</link>
	<description>Why bother seeing the world for real?</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tucson39</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2005/05/23/biosphere-2/#comment-43343</link>
		<dc:creator>Tucson39</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 18:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.googlesightseeing.com/2005/05/09/biosphere-2/#comment-43343</guid>
		<description>A new book by biospherian, Jane Poynter (The Human Experiment:Two Years and Twenty Minutes Inside Biosphere) is suppose to clarify the CO2 question. There is an excerpt from the book on that subject here: http://janepoynter.com/excerpts.asp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new book by biospherian, Jane Poynter (The Human Experiment:Two Years and Twenty Minutes Inside Biosphere) is suppose to clarify the CO2 question. There is an excerpt from the book on that subject here: <a href="http://janepoynter.com/excerpts.asp" rel="nofollow">http://janepoynter.com/excerpts.asp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cenema158</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2005/05/23/biosphere-2/#comment-11227</link>
		<dc:creator>cenema158</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Apr 2006 17:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.googlesightseeing.com/2005/05/09/biosphere-2/#comment-11227</guid>
		<description>Ive been there. The deal about the cement is that it had not dried, and it was sucking up the oxygen not carbon dioxide. I actually went inside biosphere in 02, and it was great!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ive been there. The deal about the cement is that it had not dried, and it was sucking up the oxygen not carbon dioxide. I actually went inside biosphere in 02, and it was great!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cacafuego</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2005/05/23/biosphere-2/#comment-2116</link>
		<dc:creator>cacafuego</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2005 20:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.googlesightseeing.com/2005/05/09/biosphere-2/#comment-2116</guid>
		<description>Here is an interesting reassesment of the whole thing
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/12.12/biosphere.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is an interesting reassesment of the whole thing<br />
<a href="http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/12.12/biosphere.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/12.12/biosphere.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2005/05/23/biosphere-2/#comment-2075</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2005 19:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.googlesightseeing.com/2005/05/09/biosphere-2/#comment-2075</guid>
		<description>Actually, I think what happened with Biosphere 2 is that as the concrete that made up the Biosphere aged, it absorbed CO2, so the cycle became unbalanced and screwed up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I think what happened with Biosphere 2 is that as the concrete that made up the Biosphere aged, it absorbed CO2, so the cycle became unbalanced and screwed up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>