<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ship Graveyard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://googlesightseeing.com/2005/07/15/ship-graveyard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2005/07/15/ship-graveyard/</link>
	<description>Why bother seeing the world for real?</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 02:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Compfox</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2005/07/15/ship-graveyard/#comment-146099</link>
		<dc:creator>Compfox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 09:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.googlesightseeing.com/2005/07/15/ship-graveyard/#comment-146099</guid>
		<description>What about manipulated pictures ?
I`ve read an article about an english museum militarysubmarine, which was overlayed wit the picture of a frighter. Of cause not by google...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about manipulated pictures ?<br />
I`ve read an article about an english museum militarysubmarine, which was overlayed wit the picture of a frighter. Of cause not by google&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith T.</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2005/07/15/ship-graveyard/#comment-4271</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 18:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.googlesightseeing.com/2005/07/15/ship-graveyard/#comment-4271</guid>
		<description>The sinking land is clearly an image blending issue. (&lt;a href="http://www.keithtyler.com/sinkingland-gamma+5.png" rel="nofollow"&gt;gamma-jacked shot&lt;/a&gt;)

As for the apprently sunk ship, it doesn't appear to be sunk at all, just really dark: (&lt;a href="http://www.keithtyler.com/notsunk.png" rel="nofollow"&gt;enhanced shot&lt;/a&gt;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sinking land is clearly an image blending issue. (<a href="http://www.keithtyler.com/sinkingland-gamma+5.png" rel="nofollow">gamma-jacked shot</a>)</p>
<p>As for the apprently sunk ship, it doesn&#8217;t appear to be sunk at all, just really dark: (<a href="http://www.keithtyler.com/notsunk.png" rel="nofollow">enhanced shot</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2005/07/15/ship-graveyard/#comment-4246</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 00:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.googlesightseeing.com/2005/07/15/ship-graveyard/#comment-4246</guid>
		<description>Why don't we ask that person doing a donut in front of the blue boat?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why don&#8217;t we ask that person doing a donut in front of the blue boat?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: XF</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2005/07/15/ship-graveyard/#comment-4242</link>
		<dc:creator>XF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2005 15:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.googlesightseeing.com/2005/07/15/ship-graveyard/#comment-4242</guid>
		<description>Sorry... forgot to update the link... this is the sunk ship I was referring to:
http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=37.947968,23.570588&#38;spn=0.006768,0.010131&#38;t=k&#38;hl=en

This not half-blending or something. It is all blue-ish and it is among other ships which are fully visible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry&#8230; forgot to update the link&#8230; this is the sunk ship I was referring to:<br />
Placemark: <a href="http://googlesightseeing.com/maps?p=420&amp;c=4242&amp;ll=37.947968,23.570588&amp;spn=0.006768,0.010131&amp;t=k&amp;hl=en" rel="nofollow">Google Maps</a> / <a href='http://googlesightseeing.com/gearth/comment/4242.kml'>Google Earth</a></p>
<p>This not half-blending or something. It is all blue-ish and it is among other ships which are fully visible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2005/07/15/ship-graveyard/#comment-4241</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2005 15:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.googlesightseeing.com/2005/07/15/ship-graveyard/#comment-4241</guid>
		<description>The ghost ships do seem to be different ships in several places, but if the effect is not down to image blending, then how does one explain this section where [the land appears to be sinking][1]?

[1]: http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=37.946509,23.574933&#38;spn=0.007767,0.008317&#38;t=k&#38;hl=en</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ghost ships do seem to be different ships in several places, but if the effect is not down to image blending, then how does one explain this section where [the land appears to be sinking][1]?</p>
<p>[1]: Placemark: <a href="http://googlesightseeing.com/maps?p=420&amp;c=4241&amp;ll=37.946509,23.574933&amp;spn=0.007767,0.008317&amp;t=k&amp;hl=en" rel="nofollow">Google Maps</a> / <a href='http://googlesightseeing.com/gearth/comment/4241.kml'>Google Earth</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twombly</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2005/07/15/ship-graveyard/#comment-4240</link>
		<dc:creator>Twombly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2005 14:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.googlesightseeing.com/2005/07/15/ship-graveyard/#comment-4240</guid>
		<description>XF - interesting find, as some of the ghost images are of different ships!  (i.e. not simply duplications of the same ships, as many of the others seem to be)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>XF - interesting find, as some of the ghost images are of different ships!  (i.e. not simply duplications of the same ships, as many of the others seem to be)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2005/07/15/ship-graveyard/#comment-4239</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2005 13:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.googlesightseeing.com/2005/07/15/ship-graveyard/#comment-4239</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;XF, Alex,&lt;/b&gt;

The blue ship is tethered to the land, looks like to me. There are two (really big apparently) cable lines running from the shore to the stern of the ship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>XF, Alex,</b></p>
<p>The blue ship is tethered to the land, looks like to me. There are two (really big apparently) cable lines running from the shore to the stern of the ship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2005/07/15/ship-graveyard/#comment-4237</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2005 12:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.googlesightseeing.com/2005/07/15/ship-graveyard/#comment-4237</guid>
		<description>some of the ships really are sunken. you can tell because one end of it is lighter (closer to the surface) and the other is darker (much lower into the water).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>some of the ships really are sunken. you can tell because one end of it is lighter (closer to the surface) and the other is darker (much lower into the water).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: XF</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2005/07/15/ship-graveyard/#comment-4235</link>
		<dc:creator>XF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jul 2005 09:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.googlesightseeing.com/2005/07/15/ship-graveyard/#comment-4235</guid>
		<description>Alex, I'm not so sure this is an image glitch. Look at this ship going east a little:
http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=37.947571,23.565309&#38;spn=0.015600,0.020878&#38;z=0&#38;t=k&#38;hl=en
The blue ship is definately sunk!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex, I&#8217;m not so sure this is an image glitch. Look at this ship going east a little:<br />
Placemark: <a href="http://googlesightseeing.com/maps?p=420&amp;c=4235&amp;ll=37.947571,23.565309&amp;spn=0.015600,0.020878&amp;z=0&amp;t=k&amp;hl=en" rel="nofollow">Google Maps</a> / <a href='http://googlesightseeing.com/gearth/comment/4235.kml'>Google Earth</a><br />
The blue ship is definately sunk!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DarrenW</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2005/07/15/ship-graveyard/#comment-4227</link>
		<dc:creator>DarrenW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jul 2005 21:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.googlesightseeing.com/2005/07/15/ship-graveyard/#comment-4227</guid>
		<description>heres the  Chittagong ship beaking area in Bangladesh  again not hi res but you can see plenty of beached ships 

http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=22.446270,91.726656&#38;spn=0.070694,0.106490&#38;t=k&#38;hl=en</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heres the  Chittagong ship beaking area in Bangladesh  again not hi res but you can see plenty of beached ships </p>
<p>Placemark: <a href="http://googlesightseeing.com/maps?p=420&amp;c=4227&amp;ll=22.446270,91.726656&amp;spn=0.070694,0.106490&amp;t=k&amp;hl=en" rel="nofollow">Google Maps</a> / <a href='http://googlesightseeing.com/gearth/comment/4227.kml'>Google Earth</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
