<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Moon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://googlesightseeing.com/2005/07/20/the-moon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2005/07/20/the-moon/</link>
	<description>Why bother seeing the world for real?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:28:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tommy</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2005/07/20/the-moon/comment-page-1/#comment-122350</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.googlesightseeing.com/?p=431#comment-122350</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;There isn&#039;t a dark side of the moon, just 47% of so  we don&#039;t see from earth.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There isn&#8217;t a dark side of the moon, just 47% of so  we don&#8217;t see from earth.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Daulinger</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2005/07/20/the-moon/comment-page-1/#comment-11351</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Daulinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 02:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.googlesightseeing.com/?p=431#comment-11351</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I wonder if you will be able to see the dark-side of the moon without a flashlight&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if you will be able to see the dark-side of the moon without a flashlight</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shailesh</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2005/07/20/the-moon/comment-page-1/#comment-10436</link>
		<dc:creator>shailesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 08:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.googlesightseeing.com/?p=431#comment-10436</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;i am exiting after seen picture&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i am exiting after seen picture</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2005/07/20/the-moon/comment-page-1/#comment-4583</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2005 21:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.googlesightseeing.com/?p=431#comment-4583</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Anybody else notice that the Apollo 17 landing site is in the wrong place?  The cirrect site is the red dot at http://homepage.mac.com/stevepur/apollo17.jpg.  When I put in the correct coordinates 20.19 N, 30.77 E, the image is centered on the right place.  Maybe they got confused by the similar craters to the NNE of the two sites.  I sent Google a note on the 20th but no action so far.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anybody else notice that the Apollo 17 landing site is in the wrong place?  The cirrect site is the red dot at <a href="http://homepage.mac.com/stevepur/apollo17.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://homepage.mac.com/stevepur/apollo17.jpg</a>.  When I put in the correct coordinates 20.19 N, 30.77 E, the image is centered on the right place.  Maybe they got confused by the similar craters to the NNE of the two sites.  I sent Google a note on the 20th but no action so far.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2005/07/20/the-moon/comment-page-1/#comment-4582</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2005 20:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.googlesightseeing.com/?p=431#comment-4582</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I believe one of the future missions is to launch a satalitte similiar to the one orbiting Mars to capture possible landing sites for the upcomming Moon missions.  They will have a high resolution camera aboard.  Nasa said something about being able to see signs of a landing, but probably won&#039;t be able to see rovers and such.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe one of the future missions is to launch a satalitte similiar to the one orbiting Mars to capture possible landing sites for the upcomming Moon missions.  They will have a high resolution camera aboard.  Nasa said something about being able to see signs of a landing, but probably won&#8217;t be able to see rovers and such.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bergius</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2005/07/20/the-moon/comment-page-1/#comment-4537</link>
		<dc:creator>Bergius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2005 19:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.googlesightseeing.com/?p=431#comment-4537</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;bill, you&#039;re saying that the evidence against lunar landings are stronger than the evidence for them? Last time I checked, all evidence from the conspiracy theory camp was pretty thin compared to what NASA has produced. However, lots of people believe in God too, so I guess evidence isn&#039;t that important to everyone.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bill, you&#8217;re saying that the evidence against lunar landings are stronger than the evidence for them? Last time I checked, all evidence from the conspiracy theory camp was pretty thin compared to what NASA has produced. However, lots of people believe in God too, so I guess evidence isn&#8217;t that important to everyone.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2005/07/20/the-moon/comment-page-1/#comment-4525</link>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2005 16:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.googlesightseeing.com/?p=431#comment-4525</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;poster Infinity jests, but he is correct.  We have never had a manned trip to the moon. The shuttle is as high as it goes.  In regards to Clementine, guess NASA just &quot;forgot&quot; to put a hi-res cam on. The technology was available. A little like  &quot;forgetting&quot; the biological instruments on the rover.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>poster Infinity jests, but he is correct.  We have never had a manned trip to the moon. The shuttle is as high as it goes.  In regards to Clementine, guess NASA just &#8220;forgot&#8221; to put a hi-res cam on. The technology was available. A little like  &#8220;forgetting&#8221; the biological instruments on the rover.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2005/07/20/the-moon/comment-page-1/#comment-4516</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2005 15:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.googlesightseeing.com/?p=431#comment-4516</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I initially thought that this was only a very small part of the moon, but it turns out I was wrong.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Compare the locations of the landing sites shown here: http://www.lpi.usra.edu/publications/slidesets/apollolanding/ApolloLanding/slide_01.html&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You can find all the craters in the right spots, so I think it must show the whole surface (except polar areas)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I initially thought that this was only a very small part of the moon, but it turns out I was wrong.</p>

<p>Compare the locations of the landing sites shown here: <a href="http://www.lpi.usra.edu/publications/slidesets/apollolanding/ApolloLanding/slide_01.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.lpi.usra.edu/publications/slidesets/apollolanding/ApolloLanding/slide_01.html</a></p>

<p>You can find all the craters in the right spots, so I think it must show the whole surface (except polar areas)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivan</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2005/07/20/the-moon/comment-page-1/#comment-4485</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2005 02:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.googlesightseeing.com/?p=431#comment-4485</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;neat, but why can&#039;t we search directions? ;)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>neat, but why can&#8217;t we search directions? <img src='http://googlesightseeing.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lurlock</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2005/07/20/the-moon/comment-page-1/#comment-4457</link>
		<dc:creator>Lurlock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2005 14:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.googlesightseeing.com/?p=431#comment-4457</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t know if anybody else has stumbled onto this yet, but apparently Google has some very big plans for the Moon in the works:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://www.google.com/jobs/lunar_job.html&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if anybody else has stumbled onto this yet, but apparently Google has some very big plans for the Moon in the works:</p>

<p><a href="http://www.google.com/jobs/lunar_job.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/jobs/lunar_job.html</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 3/19 queries in 0.043 seconds using memcached

Served from: satellitesightseeing.com @ 2010-03-19 12:58:39 -->