<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Soviet Tank Graveyard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://googlesightseeing.com/2006/03/07/russian-tank-graveyard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2006/03/07/russian-tank-graveyard/</link>
	<description>Why bother seeing the world for real?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:44:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ollie :)</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2006/03/07/russian-tank-graveyard/comment-page-1/#comment-201959</link>
		<dc:creator>Ollie :)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 08:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/?p=822#comment-201959</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Okay I suck at HTML as where it says the aircraft names above it Should be a link BUT its not so I&#039;m going to give you guys a direct link to blueprints which give and aerial view. I see the similarity but I think its the F-16 seeing that the harrier&#039;s intake at the sides is more obveous but are not so apparent in the images on GE.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;F-16: http://www.militaryfactory.com/blueprints/imgs_ac/f16.gif&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Sea Harrier: http://www.militaryfactory.com/blueprints/imgs_ac/bae_harrier.gif&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;AV-8B Harrier: http://www.militaryfactory.com/blueprints/imgs_ac/av8b.gif&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Note how the Harrier&#039;s tail starts quite a little AFTER the end of the wings whereas the F-16&#039;s tail starts right after the Wings.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay I suck at HTML as where it says the aircraft names above it Should be a link BUT its not so I&#8217;m going to give you guys a direct link to blueprints which give and aerial view. I see the similarity but I think its the F-16 seeing that the harrier&#8217;s intake at the sides is more obveous but are not so apparent in the images on GE.</p>

<p>F-16: <a href="http://www.militaryfactory.com/blueprints/imgs_ac/f16.gif" rel="nofollow">http://www.militaryfactory.com/blueprints/imgs_ac/f16.gif</a></p>

<p>Sea Harrier: <a href="http://www.militaryfactory.com/blueprints/imgs_ac/bae_harrier.gif" rel="nofollow">http://www.militaryfactory.com/blueprints/imgs_ac/bae_harrier.gif</a></p>

<p>AV-8B Harrier: <a href="http://www.militaryfactory.com/blueprints/imgs_ac/av8b.gif" rel="nofollow">http://www.militaryfactory.com/blueprints/imgs_ac/av8b.gif</a></p>

<p>Note how the Harrier&#8217;s tail starts quite a little AFTER the end of the wings whereas the F-16&#8217;s tail starts right after the Wings.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ollie :)</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2006/03/07/russian-tank-graveyard/comment-page-1/#comment-201958</link>
		<dc:creator>Ollie :)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 08:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/?p=822#comment-201958</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Behold F-16 and AV-8B Harrier&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ll let you decide, I think its the F-16 personally.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Behold F-16 and AV-8B Harrier</p>

<p>I&#8217;ll let you decide, I think its the F-16 personally.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ollie :)</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2006/03/07/russian-tank-graveyard/comment-page-1/#comment-201957</link>
		<dc:creator>Ollie :)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 08:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/?p=822#comment-201957</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m looking on Google Earth now, I think the fighter jets are F-16&#039;s or F-2A&#039;s (they look pretty much the same). And I think I also see some UH-60&#039;s.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m looking on Google Earth now, I think the fighter jets are F-16&#8217;s or F-2A&#8217;s (they look pretty much the same). And I think I also see some UH-60&#8217;s.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommy Haines</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2006/03/07/russian-tank-graveyard/comment-page-1/#comment-199067</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy Haines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 16:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/?p=822#comment-199067</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The Russian tank graveyard is great!the buildings in the second picture are in fact Russian built repair shops-I toured these buildings 1n 2004-2005,while attached to the Afghan Army&#039;s Kabul Military Training Center.These buildings are seperate from the main compound.they most probably contain unexploded ordnance-I DO know that they contain posionous snakes,and scorpions--DONT GO IN!!! A lot of the tanks,APC&#039;s,trucks,and the occaisional helicopter are in the adjoining field-also a Bear bomber(in large pieces) If you want junk,and you have a sense of adventure,go on in!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Russian tank graveyard is great!the buildings in the second picture are in fact Russian built repair shops-I toured these buildings 1n 2004-2005,while attached to the Afghan Army&#8217;s Kabul Military Training Center.These buildings are seperate from the main compound.they most probably contain unexploded ordnance-I DO know that they contain posionous snakes,and scorpions&#8211;DONT GO IN!!! A lot of the tanks,APC&#8217;s,trucks,and the occaisional helicopter are in the adjoining field-also a Bear bomber(in large pieces) If you want junk,and you have a sense of adventure,go on in!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Singapore</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2006/03/07/russian-tank-graveyard/comment-page-1/#comment-146305</link>
		<dc:creator>James Singapore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 07:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/?p=822#comment-146305</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I am looking for a electric starter 24volts for a Russian tank engine anyone can help the engine model not available its a 12 cylinder diesel engine the starter is srapped onto the side of the engine pinion is 11 teeth and 2-1/2 Diameter&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am looking for a electric starter 24volts for a Russian tank engine anyone can help the engine model not available its a 12 cylinder diesel engine the starter is srapped onto the side of the engine pinion is 11 teeth and 2-1/2 Diameter</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2006/03/07/russian-tank-graveyard/comment-page-1/#comment-47992</link>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Sep 2006 11:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/?p=822#comment-47992</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;those other aircraft are EA-6B Prowlers.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>those other aircraft are EA-6B Prowlers.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dogboy</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2006/03/07/russian-tank-graveyard/comment-page-1/#comment-15732</link>
		<dc:creator>Dogboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 19:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/?p=822#comment-15732</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you Bill,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;S/F
Dogboy&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Bill,</p>

<p>S/F
Dogboy</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skipper</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2006/03/07/russian-tank-graveyard/comment-page-1/#comment-10344</link>
		<dc:creator>Skipper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 15:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/?p=822#comment-10344</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;ah well tanks very much for that... hahahaha sorry just felt the need..&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ah well tanks very much for that&#8230; hahahaha sorry just felt the need..</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2006/03/07/russian-tank-graveyard/comment-page-1/#comment-10259</link>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 13:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/?p=822#comment-10259</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Randall, You are correct that the Harrier had technical problems. In the late &#039;90s the Marine Corps started to refurb their Harriers and are now proving to be very mission capable aircraft. The Brits are also upgrading their Harriers so I believe they will be around for some time. They are very good at Close Air Support missions for protecting ground units.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I personally did not work with the Harriers, but we often deployed our FA-18 Hornets to the same forward operating bases... FYI, Harriers pilots are NUTS!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Randall, You are correct that the Harrier had technical problems. In the late &#8217;90s the Marine Corps started to refurb their Harriers and are now proving to be very mission capable aircraft. The Brits are also upgrading their Harriers so I believe they will be around for some time. They are very good at Close Air Support missions for protecting ground units.</p>

<p>I personally did not work with the Harriers, but we often deployed our FA-18 Hornets to the same forward operating bases&#8230; FYI, Harriers pilots are NUTS!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2006/03/07/russian-tank-graveyard/comment-page-1/#comment-10257</link>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 13:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/?p=822#comment-10257</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;They are USMC AV-8B Harrier II&#039;s. I could come up with the tail numbers if I look around...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&quot;USMC Harrier IIs saw action in the Afghanistan campaign ......... providing support for Marine special operations forces operating in the country.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;-Bill
USMC Retired&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are USMC AV-8B Harrier II&#8217;s. I could come up with the tail numbers if I look around&#8230;</p>

<p>&#8220;USMC Harrier IIs saw action in the Afghanistan campaign &#8230;&#8230;&#8230; providing support for Marine special operations forces operating in the country.&#8221;</p>

<p>-Bill
USMC Retired</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/19 queries in 0.108 seconds using memcached

Served from: satellitesightseeing.com @ 2010-03-20 01:51:38 -->