<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Soviet Tank Graveyard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://googlesightseeing.com/2006/03/07/russian-tank-graveyard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2006/03/07/russian-tank-graveyard/</link>
	<description>Why bother seeing the world for real?</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 02:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tommy Haines</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2006/03/07/russian-tank-graveyard/#comment-199067</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy Haines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 16:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/?p=822#comment-199067</guid>
		<description>The Russian tank graveyard is great!the buildings in the second picture are in fact Russian built repair shops-I toured these buildings 1n 2004-2005,while attached to the Afghan Army's Kabul Military Training Center.These buildings are seperate from the main compound.they most probably contain unexploded ordnance-I DO know that they contain posionous snakes,and scorpions--DONT GO IN!!! A lot of the tanks,APC's,trucks,and the occaisional helicopter are in the adjoining field-also a Bear bomber(in large pieces) If you want junk,and you have a sense of adventure,go on in!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Russian tank graveyard is great!the buildings in the second picture are in fact Russian built repair shops-I toured these buildings 1n 2004-2005,while attached to the Afghan Army&#8217;s Kabul Military Training Center.These buildings are seperate from the main compound.they most probably contain unexploded ordnance-I DO know that they contain posionous snakes,and scorpions&#8211;DONT GO IN!!! A lot of the tanks,APC&#8217;s,trucks,and the occaisional helicopter are in the adjoining field-also a Bear bomber(in large pieces) If you want junk,and you have a sense of adventure,go on in!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Singapore</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2006/03/07/russian-tank-graveyard/#comment-146305</link>
		<dc:creator>James Singapore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 07:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/?p=822#comment-146305</guid>
		<description>I am looking for a electric starter 24volts for a Russian tank engine anyone can help the engine model not available its a 12 cylinder diesel engine the starter is srapped onto the side of the engine pinion is 11 teeth and 2-1/2 Diameter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am looking for a electric starter 24volts for a Russian tank engine anyone can help the engine model not available its a 12 cylinder diesel engine the starter is srapped onto the side of the engine pinion is 11 teeth and 2-1/2 Diameter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2006/03/07/russian-tank-graveyard/#comment-47992</link>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Sep 2006 11:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/?p=822#comment-47992</guid>
		<description>those other aircraft are EA-6B Prowlers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>those other aircraft are EA-6B Prowlers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dogboy</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2006/03/07/russian-tank-graveyard/#comment-15732</link>
		<dc:creator>Dogboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 19:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/?p=822#comment-15732</guid>
		<description>Thank you Bill, 

S/F
Dogboy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Bill, </p>
<p>S/F<br />
Dogboy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skipper</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2006/03/07/russian-tank-graveyard/#comment-10344</link>
		<dc:creator>Skipper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2006 15:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/?p=822#comment-10344</guid>
		<description>ah well tanks very much for that... hahahaha sorry just felt the need..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ah well tanks very much for that&#8230; hahahaha sorry just felt the need..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2006/03/07/russian-tank-graveyard/#comment-10259</link>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 13:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/?p=822#comment-10259</guid>
		<description>Randall, You are correct that the Harrier had technical problems. In the late '90s the Marine Corps started to refurb their Harriers and are now proving to be very mission capable aircraft. The Brits are also upgrading their Harriers so I believe they will be around for some time. They are very good at Close Air Support missions for protecting ground units.

I personally did not work with the Harriers, but we often deployed our FA-18 Hornets to the same forward operating bases... FYI, Harriers pilots are NUTS!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Randall, You are correct that the Harrier had technical problems. In the late &#8217;90s the Marine Corps started to refurb their Harriers and are now proving to be very mission capable aircraft. The Brits are also upgrading their Harriers so I believe they will be around for some time. They are very good at Close Air Support missions for protecting ground units.</p>
<p>I personally did not work with the Harriers, but we often deployed our FA-18 Hornets to the same forward operating bases&#8230; FYI, Harriers pilots are NUTS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2006/03/07/russian-tank-graveyard/#comment-10257</link>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 13:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/?p=822#comment-10257</guid>
		<description>They are USMC AV-8B Harrier II's. I could come up with the tail numbers if I look around...

"USMC Harrier IIs saw action in the Afghanistan campaign ......... providing support for Marine special operations forces operating in the country."


-Bill
USMC Retired</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are USMC AV-8B Harrier II&#8217;s. I could come up with the tail numbers if I look around&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;USMC Harrier IIs saw action in the Afghanistan campaign &#8230;&#8230;&#8230; providing support for Marine special operations forces operating in the country.&#8221;</p>
<p>-Bill<br />
USMC Retired</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2006/03/07/russian-tank-graveyard/#comment-10248</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 05:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/?p=822#comment-10248</guid>
		<description>@ randall:  f-16's are falcons, not hornets.  the f/a-18 is the hornet.  anyway, the tail is all wrong to be f16's and the sweep isnt severe enough.  i agree with the harrier assessment, despite the logistical arguement against it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ randall:  f-16&#8217;s are falcons, not hornets.  the f/a-18 is the hornet.  anyway, the tail is all wrong to be f16&#8217;s and the sweep isnt severe enough.  i agree with the harrier assessment, despite the logistical arguement against it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: randall</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2006/03/07/russian-tank-graveyard/#comment-10244</link>
		<dc:creator>randall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 04:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/?p=822#comment-10244</guid>
		<description>lee I dont think that they are harriers.

1) harriers are rarely used in U.S. military operations anymore, not efficient enough.

2) they seem to resemble f-16A hornet's with that delta wing.  harriers have a more swept wing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lee I dont think that they are harriers.</p>
<p>1) harriers are rarely used in U.S. military operations anymore, not efficient enough.</p>
<p>2) they seem to resemble f-16A hornet&#8217;s with that delta wing.  harriers have a more swept wing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2006/03/07/russian-tank-graveyard/#comment-10228</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 19:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/?p=822#comment-10228</guid>
		<description>Lee - I believe that you are correct and that would make sense. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lee - I believe that you are correct and that would make sense. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>