<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Iguazu Falls</title>
	<atom:link href="http://googlesightseeing.com/2006/07/26/iguazu-falls/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2006/07/26/iguazu-falls/</link>
	<description>Why bother seeing the world for real?</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 23:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: kit-kat</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2006/07/26/iguazu-falls/#comment-51972</link>
		<dc:creator>kit-kat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2006 03:13:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/?p=1011#comment-51972</guid>
		<description>I used to live in Buenos Aires, Argentina, I was born there but I left to the US when I was 4, I knew I wasn't going to go to iguazu falls because it was to far away but I always wanted to go there 'cause I always heard people talking about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to live in Buenos Aires, Argentina, I was born there but I left to the US when I was 4, I knew I wasn&#8217;t going to go to iguazu falls because it was to far away but I always wanted to go there &#8217;cause I always heard people talking about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ARal</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2006/07/26/iguazu-falls/#comment-40553</link>
		<dc:creator>ARal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 08:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/?p=1011#comment-40553</guid>
		<description>They are amazing. But I find the 'Vic' falls even more impressive than Iguazu. Since most people cannot fly to both quicklly, have you checked them out on Google Earth? INCREDIBLE! I looked at Niagara, Iguazu and Victoria all from 4000 feet above the ground (at that height Iguazu and Vic Falls pretty much fill up screen) to get an honest comparison, and it is incredible to see. 

I've been to the wiki page you mention and even according to it (and other sites I have seen on the web) the area of victoria falls is much larger than Iguazu. i.e. of Victoria's 1.708km every bit is in flow in high season, whilst of Iguazu's 2.7km only 1.8km is. That still makes Iguazu slightly wider, but since most of Iguazu are 64m tall (tallest bit just under 82m) and Victoria ranges from 97m to 108m, Victoria's area of falling water is about 40% larger (1.8 million square feet versus 1.3 million. Niagara about 600 000 - so Iguazu is twice the size of Niagara but Victoria is three times). 

Iguazu has an amazing shape - which allows you to go and see the falls leisurely and take it all in in manageable chunks. You can do that with vic falls by flying above them ('wow' is the only word).  Iguazu is stunningly stunningly beautiful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are amazing. But I find the &#8216;Vic&#8217; falls even more impressive than Iguazu. Since most people cannot fly to both quicklly, have you checked them out on Google Earth? INCREDIBLE! I looked at Niagara, Iguazu and Victoria all from 4000 feet above the ground (at that height Iguazu and Vic Falls pretty much fill up screen) to get an honest comparison, and it is incredible to see. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been to the wiki page you mention and even according to it (and other sites I have seen on the web) the area of victoria falls is much larger than Iguazu. i.e. of Victoria&#8217;s 1.708km every bit is in flow in high season, whilst of Iguazu&#8217;s 2.7km only 1.8km is. That still makes Iguazu slightly wider, but since most of Iguazu are 64m tall (tallest bit just under 82m) and Victoria ranges from 97m to 108m, Victoria&#8217;s area of falling water is about 40% larger (1.8 million square feet versus 1.3 million. Niagara about 600 000 - so Iguazu is twice the size of Niagara but Victoria is three times). </p>
<p>Iguazu has an amazing shape - which allows you to go and see the falls leisurely and take it all in in manageable chunks. You can do that with vic falls by flying above them (&#8217;wow&#8217; is the only word).  Iguazu is stunningly stunningly beautiful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leon el africano</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2006/07/26/iguazu-falls/#comment-40513</link>
		<dc:creator>Leon el africano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 21:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/?p=1011#comment-40513</guid>
		<description>Amazing pictures!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing pictures!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spamboy</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2006/07/26/iguazu-falls/#comment-40484</link>
		<dc:creator>Spamboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 15:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/?p=1011#comment-40484</guid>
		<description>I have some closeup shots of the "Devil's Throat", both from upfront and up above, on my Flickr site at &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/spamboy/tags/iguacu/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/spamboy/tags/iguacu/&lt;/a&gt;.  The cacophony of white noise as so much water crashes down is awe-inspiring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have some closeup shots of the &#8220;Devil&#8217;s Throat&#8221;, both from upfront and up above, on my Flickr site at <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/spamboy/tags/iguacu/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/spamboy/tags/iguacu/</a>.  The cacophony of white noise as so much water crashes down is awe-inspiring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Les</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2006/07/26/iguazu-falls/#comment-40477</link>
		<dc:creator>Les</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 14:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/?p=1011#comment-40477</guid>
		<description>It is a pity about the falls being so low at the moment, but they will recover I have no doubt. 

They are quite incredible, completely and unambiguously surpassing Niagara. I think only the Victoria falls are more impressive, though they're much harder to see because it isn't split into so many chunks and just falls as one 'cutain' into that chasm... Anyway - I certainly find those the 2 greatest  (the Wiki page you point us ot says how the surface area of Iguazu is over twice that of Niagara, and Victoria Falls over 3 times!). 

I read that 1 guy who said that low water 'it's revealing a new kind of beauty'. I'm afraid that seems like trying to keep tourists coming... I hope come september taht they are raging again...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a pity about the falls being so low at the moment, but they will recover I have no doubt. </p>
<p>They are quite incredible, completely and unambiguously surpassing Niagara. I think only the Victoria falls are more impressive, though they&#8217;re much harder to see because it isn&#8217;t split into so many chunks and just falls as one &#8216;cutain&#8217; into that chasm&#8230; Anyway - I certainly find those the 2 greatest  (the Wiki page you point us ot says how the surface area of Iguazu is over twice that of Niagara, and Victoria Falls over 3 times!). </p>
<p>I read that 1 guy who said that low water &#8216;it&#8217;s revealing a new kind of beauty&#8217;. I&#8217;m afraid that seems like trying to keep tourists coming&#8230; I hope come september taht they are raging again&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S. Scruggs</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2006/07/26/iguazu-falls/#comment-40386</link>
		<dc:creator>S. Scruggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 12:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/?p=1011#comment-40386</guid>
		<description>In the Iguazu Falls photos you have a yellow flower that you needed the name of: Allamanda Cathartica or commonly called Golden Trumpet Vine. Highly toxic sap-native of Brazil but grown worldwide by hardwood cultivation. Beautiful waxy petals hybridized in several colors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the Iguazu Falls photos you have a yellow flower that you needed the name of: Allamanda Cathartica or commonly called Golden Trumpet Vine. Highly toxic sap-native of Brazil but grown worldwide by hardwood cultivation. Beautiful waxy petals hybridized in several colors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alessandro</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2006/07/26/iguazu-falls/#comment-39956</link>
		<dc:creator>Alessandro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 17:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/?p=1011#comment-39956</guid>
		<description>The name in Argentina is "Iguazu" and, in Brazil is "IguaÃ§u"
"AbraÃ§os" from SÃ£o Paulo, br</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The name in Argentina is &#8220;Iguazu&#8221; and, in Brazil is &#8220;IguaÃ§u&#8221;<br />
&#8220;AbraÃ§os&#8221; from SÃ£o Paulo, br</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather Muise</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2006/07/26/iguazu-falls/#comment-39829</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather Muise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 02:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/?p=1011#comment-39829</guid>
		<description>Wow.  Thanks for sharing that.  As a bit of a geography buff, I'm so ashamed to admit I've never even heard of this amazing place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  Thanks for sharing that.  As a bit of a geography buff, I&#8217;m so ashamed to admit I&#8217;ve never even heard of this amazing place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2006/07/26/iguazu-falls/#comment-39725</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 19:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/?p=1011#comment-39725</guid>
		<description>I visited Iguazu in 1999, and it was an incredibles sight. We also took a boat up the river to get a close look at the falls. The area around the falls is quite beautiful as well. We went on a tour of the forest and saw many interesting animals and such. If you are in the area it is definitely a sight worth seeing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I visited Iguazu in 1999, and it was an incredibles sight. We also took a boat up the river to get a close look at the falls. The area around the falls is quite beautiful as well. We went on a tour of the forest and saw many interesting animals and such. If you are in the area it is definitely a sight worth seeing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpedAngel</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2006/07/26/iguazu-falls/#comment-39702</link>
		<dc:creator>SpedAngel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 17:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/?p=1011#comment-39702</guid>
		<description>Hmmm Josh, "learnt" is the exact same word as "learned." However, due to the variations between how the American English language and the British English language have evolved, we are more familiar with the past tense being "learned." And James, you should know better than to listen to someone whose correction includes the misspelling of the word "sentence." ;) (I'm just teasing here btw! But it is true that both spellings are correct.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm Josh, &#8220;learnt&#8221; is the exact same word as &#8220;learned.&#8221; However, due to the variations between how the American English language and the British English language have evolved, we are more familiar with the past tense being &#8220;learned.&#8221; And James, you should know better than to listen to someone whose correction includes the misspelling of the word &#8220;sentence.&#8221; <img src='http://googlesightseeing.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> (I&#8217;m just teasing here btw! But it is true that both spellings are correct.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
