Comments on: The LA Times http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/01/07/the-la-times/ Why bother seeing the world for real? Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:32:10 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: Jay O'Three http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/01/07/the-la-times/comment-page-1/#comment-98636 Jay O'Three Tue, 09 Jan 2007 04:48:35 +0000 http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/01/07/the-la-times/#comment-98636 To amplify what Mike Diehl is saying, Dan Neil is a Pulitzer Prize winner! You got ink from one of THE best writers in the newspaper game. Jay O'Three also reads him every week in the Automotive section and every week in West. I had never heard of you guys until I read his column. Good on ya'! To amplify what Mike Diehl is saying, Dan Neil is a Pulitzer Prize winner! You got ink from one of THE best writers in the newspaper game. Jay O’Three also reads him every week in the Automotive section and every week in West. I had never heard of you guys until I read his column.

Good on ya’!

]]> By: Alex http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/01/07/the-la-times/comment-page-1/#comment-98614 Alex Mon, 08 Jan 2007 23:37:18 +0000 http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/01/07/the-la-times/#comment-98614 Tim, that just makes me think about "<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biggus_Dickus" rel="nofollow">Biggus Dickus</a>" Lol! :-D Tim, that just makes me think about “Biggus Dickus” Lol! :-D

]]> By: Tim http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/01/07/the-la-times/comment-page-1/#comment-98604 Tim Mon, 08 Jan 2007 22:10:02 +0000 http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/01/07/the-la-times/#comment-98604 Gotcha... No, seriously, I'm no good at Latin. I know perfectly well what "d**k" means but not "phallus". Gotcha…

No, seriously, I’m no good at Latin. I know perfectly well what “d**k” means but not “phallus”.

]]> By: Alex http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/01/07/the-la-times/comment-page-1/#comment-98597 Alex Mon, 08 Jan 2007 21:04:09 +0000 http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/01/07/the-la-times/#comment-98597 Tim, judging by <a href="http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/01/05/unidentified-flying-water-droplet/comment-page-1/#comment-98546" rel="nofollow">your comment here</a>, I can only assume you are being facetious... ;-) Tim, judging by your comment here, I can only assume you are being facetious… ;-)

]]> By: Tim http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/01/07/the-la-times/comment-page-1/#comment-98547 Tim Mon, 08 Jan 2007 05:28:04 +0000 http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/01/07/the-la-times/#comment-98547 "Charming little book"? Well, I suppose it is, kind of. You ought to get a bunch of new visitors in LA soon. Well, you might get more if the LA Times weren't going through a big financial squeeze; clearly they don't have as many readers as they'd like. Not to be discouraging though. Um, btw, what's a phallus? “Charming little book”? Well, I suppose it is, kind of. You ought to get a bunch of new visitors in LA soon. Well, you might get more if the LA Times weren’t going through a big financial squeeze; clearly they don’t have as many readers as they’d like. Not to be discouraging though.

Um, btw, what’s a phallus?

]]> By: Alex http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/01/07/the-la-times/comment-page-1/#comment-98507 Alex Sun, 07 Jan 2007 22:11:01 +0000 http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/01/07/the-la-times/#comment-98507 yes rob, the comments seem to be behaving a bit better! Although actually we've _all_ just been looking at old pages for a while... christooss, um... pardon? Could you elaborate please? yes rob, the comments seem to be behaving a bit better! Although actually we’ve _all_ just been looking at old pages for a while…

christooss, um… pardon? Could you elaborate please?

]]> By: christooss http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/01/07/the-la-times/comment-page-1/#comment-98505 christooss Sun, 07 Jan 2007 21:57:59 +0000 http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/01/07/the-la-times/#comment-98505 T-shirt: Who are you? Are you on Google Sight seeing jet? T-shirt:

Who are you? Are you on Google Sight seeing jet?

]]> By: rob http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/01/07/the-la-times/comment-page-1/#comment-98503 rob Sun, 07 Jan 2007 20:30:33 +0000 http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/01/07/the-la-times/#comment-98503 The comments are working again! The comments are working again!

]]> By: Alex http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/01/07/the-la-times/comment-page-1/#comment-98500 Alex Sun, 07 Jan 2007 20:02:31 +0000 http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/01/07/the-la-times/#comment-98500 Thanks for the kind comments regular readers, and a very warm welcome to our new ones! cherie, as a new reader you won't know that we're actually based in Edinburgh... Scotland! Thanks for the kind comments regular readers, and a very warm welcome to our new ones!

cherie, as a new reader you won’t know that we’re actually based in Edinburgh… Scotland!

]]> By: Mike Diehl http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/01/07/the-la-times/comment-page-1/#comment-98493 Mike Diehl Sun, 07 Jan 2007 17:44:44 +0000 http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/01/07/the-la-times/#comment-98493 The piece is in the Sunday magazine, West, and is written by Dan Neil, who's editor of the automotive section (!). His writing about cars is/was so entertaining and insightful the paper gave him "800 words" (the title of his column in West) to explore any topic he finds interesting. I read it religiously, and it was this week's piece that led me here. I look forward to exploring googlesightseeing.com! The piece is in the Sunday magazine, West, and is written by Dan Neil, who’s editor of the automotive section (!). His writing about cars is/was so entertaining and insightful the paper gave him “800 words” (the title of his column in West) to explore any topic he finds interesting. I read it religiously, and it was this week’s piece that led me here. I look forward to exploring googlesightseeing.com!

]]>