Comments on: Half Naked Sunbathing Girls on Google Street View

By: bob jones

bob jones — Wed, 28 May 2008 03:16:01 +0000

take off all your clothes

By: jz

jz — Wed, 28 Nov 2007 08:48:43 +0000

To #2 and #3. The answer to why censor is for the reason given in #1!! You are thinking they didn’t mind sunbathing in the first place, so therefore they don’t mind being in a giant computer data base permanently for anyone to view. That’s just stupid. Sure, they might not mind, but if they did mind they now can’t change it, EVER. Before google street view, they just decide not to do that anymore, and no one would ever see them do that again. But now with this technology, they can’t undo it. Now, I can’t see a reason they would mind being seen other than the fact that it’s now permanent. That’s a freaky feeling in a way. Sunbathers are not really a big deal. But I’m sure this issue is going to keep popping up and eventually someone who doesn’t want to be seen in a database, will be. And they will not have a way to remove their picture. That’s what I object to and that’s what I think is unfair. I’m sure there will be others that will think the same thing.

By: hahaha

hahaha — Sat, 08 Sep 2007 09:13:02 +0000

i was expecting some big , booby babes to stand out there naked with her bladder shut with one hand. !! ??

By: cookies

cookies — Sat, 08 Sep 2007 09:10:44 +0000

this is not at all nice. i was expecting some big , booby babes to stand out there naked with her bladder shut with one hand. !! ??

By: jsing

jsing — Mon, 20 Aug 2007 15:17:25 +0000

Beauti ful photos

By: CharleneW128

CharleneW128 — Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:27:16 +0000

Wow! That’s ME!! For real guys, I was out there catching some sun recently. I even recognize myself and my friend Denise.

I don’t care if people see me in my bathings suit. If I cared I wouldn’t have gone there and stripped out of my shorts and t-shirt. I mean: duh!

How come people want to censor me? I’m the one who went outside dressed like that. I dress the way I want to. But you want to censor … whatta you think I’m ugly or something?!

I’m feeling insulted.

By: JeffB

JeffB — Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:19:03 +0000

Here’s the problem as I see it:
1) Not EVERYONE is ashamed to be seen in a bathing suit. So why assume that these women think they’re “ulgy” and want to be censored, just because you think that way about yourself?
2) Google is mapping the United States. If you eliminate bathing suits, you eliminate most of the the entire coastal roadway system of California, Texas, Florida and Hawaii.
3) What’s so bad about bathing suits? Where are you people typing your replies from? Islamabad? Lighten up a little.

By: Clyde

Clyde — Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:01:29 +0000

Google Gone Wild!

So where are the pictures of O.J. Simpson’s ex-wife’s demise. Or didn’t we have satalites back then?

By: KEN K

KEN K — Fri, 03 Aug 2007 15:53:57 +0000

we are so prudish in the states, see one naked body seen them all- besides a girls body is so beautiful to look at, and to touch ,soft and silky…let those alone that want to get naked in public, men walk around with out shirts and speedos so….im all for nakedness anytime anywhere..except church

By: dcdivenut

dcdivenut — Thu, 28 Jun 2007 15:10:56 +0000

I know this may be a little over the head of the average “netizen” and based on previous comments here, probably waaaay to complicated, but the US Supreme Court has made several rulings based on what is called, “reasonable expectation of privacy” If you look at the link in the post above (http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&q=googleplex&sll=37.448697,-120.948486&sspn=2.94791,5.141602&ie=UTF8&t=h&om=1&layer=c&cbll=37.42428,-122.16063&cbp=1,319.6953192450783,0.557816774776505,3&gl=us&hl=en&ll=37.424852,-122.160764&spn=0.00112,0.00294&z=19)

you can see that there is another woman about 50 feet behind them and what looks like 4 guys playing basketball another 100 feet past that. If they are topless (which I doubt) then there is no invasion of privacy since they have no reasonable expectation of privacy in a public place.

The same thing goes for someone caught taking a leak on a wall or doing something stupid, especially on Street view. While a Sat image might catch someone in a backyard that might be fenced (where there is an expectation of privacy) StreetView captures images from street level, or almost eye level view, so that someone sunbathing in plain view, pissing on a fence or smoking outside their store has no “reasonable right of privacy”