<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inappropriate Images In Street View</title>
	<atom:link href="http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/05/31/inappropriate-images-in-street-view/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/05/31/inappropriate-images-in-street-view/</link>
	<description>Why bother seeing the world for real?</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 00:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: gerard</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/05/31/inappropriate-images-in-street-view/#comment-203914</link>
		<dc:creator>gerard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 13:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/05/31/inappropriate-images-in-street-view/#comment-203914</guid>
		<description>How about this one ?
http://maps.google.fr/maps?f=q&#38;hl=fr&#38;geocode=&#38;q=paris+trocadero&#38;sll=48.853767,2.358112&#38;sspn=0.004927,0.011158&#38;ie=UTF8&#38;ll=48.882533,2.338725&#38;spn=0,359.988842&#38;z=17&#38;layer=c&#38;cbll=48.883748,2.333138&#38;panoid=awzjvCjx6CNR8Nu6MntLtg&#38;cbp=12,2.6005827318530237,,1,6.316608177362393</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about this one ?<br />
Placemark: <a href="http://googlesightseeing.com/maps?p=1444&amp;c=203914&amp;f=q&amp;hl=fr&amp;geocode=&amp;q=paris+trocadero&amp;sll=48.853767,2.358112&amp;sspn=0.004927,0.011158&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;ll=48.882533,2.338725&amp;spn=0,359.988842&amp;z=17&amp;layer=c&amp;cbll=48.883748,2.333138&amp;panoid=awzjvCjx6CNR8Nu6MntLtg&amp;cbp=12,2.6005827318530237,,1,6.316608177362393" rel="nofollow">Google Maps</a> / <a href='http://googlesightseeing.com/gearth/comment/203914.kml'>Google Earth</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/05/31/inappropriate-images-in-street-view/#comment-146325</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 15:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/05/31/inappropriate-images-in-street-view/#comment-146325</guid>
		<description>i discover this great photographer on flickr http://www.flickr.com/people/donbenito/ ; what you think about his work??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i discover this great photographer on flickr <a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/donbenito/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/people/donbenito/</a> ; what you think about his work??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: c</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/05/31/inappropriate-images-in-street-view/#comment-145227</link>
		<dc:creator>c</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2007 05:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/05/31/inappropriate-images-in-street-view/#comment-145227</guid>
		<description>it's life, get used to it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s life, get used to it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DigiTiki</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/05/31/inappropriate-images-in-street-view/#comment-145111</link>
		<dc:creator>DigiTiki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2007 16:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/05/31/inappropriate-images-in-street-view/#comment-145111</guid>
		<description>Tammo, you took the words right out of my mouth.  Come On People!  What disturbs me more than images of women in bathing suits are the Puritan responses that call for sensorship.  Its a woman in a bathing suit for crying out loud.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tammo, you took the words right out of my mouth.  Come On People!  What disturbs me more than images of women in bathing suits are the Puritan responses that call for sensorship.  Its a woman in a bathing suit for crying out loud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tobi</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/05/31/inappropriate-images-in-street-view/#comment-144878</link>
		<dc:creator>Tobi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 15:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/05/31/inappropriate-images-in-street-view/#comment-144878</guid>
		<description>The US, an expert in censoring nudity - and on the other hand it has the biggest porn industry - could there be a connection? when will you get it: censoring nudity is making people sexually neurotic and defenitely even more horny. to me its all hypocrite.

And concerning the kids: What you expect to happen if a kid sees a nude body? Why should it be interesting? I myself expect the kid will have forgotten it 3 minutes afterwards unless you make a big fuss about it like some of you guys...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US, an expert in censoring nudity - and on the other hand it has the biggest porn industry - could there be a connection? when will you get it: censoring nudity is making people sexually neurotic and defenitely even more horny. to me its all hypocrite.</p>
<p>And concerning the kids: What you expect to happen if a kid sees a nude body? Why should it be interesting? I myself expect the kid will have forgotten it 3 minutes afterwards unless you make a big fuss about it like some of you guys&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tammo</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/05/31/inappropriate-images-in-street-view/#comment-144719</link>
		<dc:creator>Tammo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 07:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/05/31/inappropriate-images-in-street-view/#comment-144719</guid>
		<description>Also it is quite amazing to me how many people (and I am not saying that any on this board do) that have issues with people in swimsuits have no such qualms about violence. Don't get me wrong, I'm not one of those people that think anyone that has ever watched a violent movie or played a violent game will grow up to be a killer. But to suggest that images of people in swimsuits are more harmful to children than images of people harming each other just seems very twisted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also it is quite amazing to me how many people (and I am not saying that any on this board do) that have issues with people in swimsuits have no such qualms about violence. Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I&#8217;m not one of those people that think anyone that has ever watched a violent movie or played a violent game will grow up to be a killer. But to suggest that images of people in swimsuits are more harmful to children than images of people harming each other just seems very twisted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tammo</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/05/31/inappropriate-images-in-street-view/#comment-144710</link>
		<dc:creator>Tammo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 06:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/05/31/inappropriate-images-in-street-view/#comment-144710</guid>
		<description>What the heck is 'inappropriate' about people in swimsuits??? Does that mean those of you that have problems with that never take your kids to a beach or a pool? I have yet to see a single image on this service that goes beyond that. 
You might also want to consider that by restricting your kids' access to innocent images like these, you are simply making the matter more interesting. They WILL become more computer-smart than you. They WILL bypass whatever filter you may have. And they MAY WELL stumble onto sites they definitely shouldn't be looking at.
In my experience it is much better to treat children in a way that allows them to become responsible ... rather than trying to keep them innocent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What the heck is &#8216;inappropriate&#8217; about people in swimsuits??? Does that mean those of you that have problems with that never take your kids to a beach or a pool? I have yet to see a single image on this service that goes beyond that.<br />
You might also want to consider that by restricting your kids&#8217; access to innocent images like these, you are simply making the matter more interesting. They WILL become more computer-smart than you. They WILL bypass whatever filter you may have. And they MAY WELL stumble onto sites they definitely shouldn&#8217;t be looking at.<br />
In my experience it is much better to treat children in a way that allows them to become responsible &#8230; rather than trying to keep them innocent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith T.</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/05/31/inappropriate-images-in-street-view/#comment-144671</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 23:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/05/31/inappropriate-images-in-street-view/#comment-144671</guid>
		<description>If you happen to be using Google Maps to look at street views of Las Vegas, then you are looking to see what Vegas streets look like.

If you aren't, then you are on drugs, and I don't pity you.

I fail to see how using Google Maps to look at Vegas is supposed to give better results than &lt;a href="http://images.google.com/images?q=vegas&#38;gbv=2&#38;ndsp=20&#38;svnum=10&#38;hl=en&#38;start=0&#38;sa=N" rel="nofollow"&gt;Google Image Search on "vegas" with moderate filtering&lt;/a&gt;.

Why are children searching for Las Vegas anyway? It isn't exactly top conversation around the swingset.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you happen to be using Google Maps to look at street views of Las Vegas, then you are looking to see what Vegas streets look like.</p>
<p>If you aren&#8217;t, then you are on drugs, and I don&#8217;t pity you.</p>
<p>I fail to see how using Google Maps to look at Vegas is supposed to give better results than <a href="http://images.google.com/images?q=vegas&amp;gbv=2&amp;ndsp=20&amp;svnum=10&amp;hl=en&amp;start=0&amp;sa=N" rel="nofollow">Google Image Search on &#8220;vegas&#8221; with moderate filtering</a>.</p>
<p>Why are children searching for Las Vegas anyway? It isn&#8217;t exactly top conversation around the swingset.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Sterry</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/05/31/inappropriate-images-in-street-view/#comment-144651</link>
		<dc:creator>David Sterry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 20:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/05/31/inappropriate-images-in-street-view/#comment-144651</guid>
		<description>I just made a spot to submit, vote and discuss these links... http://www.davidsterry.com/streetview</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just made a spot to submit, vote and discuss these links&#8230; <a href="http://www.davidsterry.com/streetview" rel="nofollow">http://www.davidsterry.com/streetview</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/05/31/inappropriate-images-in-street-view/#comment-144636</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 18:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/05/31/inappropriate-images-in-street-view/#comment-144636</guid>
		<description>"You’re in public space, you have no expectation of privacy."

Really?  So if I go outside I have no right to privacy?  What about the images where you can see into buildings through the windows?  Do I have no right to privacy unless I have my curtains pulled and am hiding under the bed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You’re in public space, you have no expectation of privacy.&#8221;</p>
<p>Really?  So if I go outside I have no right to privacy?  What about the images where you can see into buildings through the windows?  Do I have no right to privacy unless I have my curtains pulled and am hiding under the bed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>