<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Konkordski</title>
	<atom:link href="http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/09/20/konkordski/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/09/20/konkordski/</link>
	<description>Why bother seeing the world for real?</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 22:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/09/20/konkordski/#comment-198534</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/09/20/konkordski/#comment-198534</guid>
		<description>"Ouchebny" on russian is Educational.

Samara-Ouchebny Research Institute &#62; Samara Research and Education Institute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Ouchebny&#8221; on russian is Educational.</p>
<p>Samara-Ouchebny Research Institute &gt; Samara Research and Education Institute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BrunoCr</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/09/20/konkordski/#comment-163447</link>
		<dc:creator>BrunoCr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 12:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/09/20/konkordski/#comment-163447</guid>
		<description>BTW there are 2 more Tu-144  viewable in Yahoo in Zhukowskitest base ;)

FlashEarth direct link : -&#62; http://www.flashearth.com/?lat=55.570771&#38;lon=38.153327&#38;z=16.5&#38;r=0&#38;src=yh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW there are 2 more Tu-144  viewable in Yahoo in Zhukowskitest base <img src='http://googlesightseeing.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>FlashEarth direct link : -&gt; <a href="http://www.flashearth.com/?lat=55.570771&amp;lon=38.153327&amp;z=16.5&amp;r=0&amp;src=yh" rel="nofollow">http://www.flashearth.com/?lat=55.570771&amp;lon=38.153327&amp;z=16.5&amp;r=0&amp;src=yh</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BrunoCr</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/09/20/konkordski/#comment-163445</link>
		<dc:creator>BrunoCr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 12:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/09/20/konkordski/#comment-163445</guid>
		<description>Tu-144 has not been sold to any other company than Aeroflot. There was only 16 airworthy Tu-144 (1 prototype, 1 pre-prod and 14 prod). 2 crashed : one during a show in Le Bourget (as you said) and one during qualification flights. 

Tu-144 has been in service from 1977 to 1978 with passengers and from 1975 to 1980 for cargo.

And the story of the espionage has been contradicted even by Mr Turcat, chief test pilot on Concorde...
The fact is that a 100 passengers plane flying at Mach 2+ have to have this kind of overall form and same kind of technical solution. For experts Concorde and Tu-144 are VERY different ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tu-144 has not been sold to any other company than Aeroflot. There was only 16 airworthy Tu-144 (1 prototype, 1 pre-prod and 14 prod). 2 crashed : one during a show in Le Bourget (as you said) and one during qualification flights. </p>
<p>Tu-144 has been in service from 1977 to 1978 with passengers and from 1975 to 1980 for cargo.</p>
<p>And the story of the espionage has been contradicted even by Mr Turcat, chief test pilot on Concorde&#8230;<br />
The fact is that a 100 passengers plane flying at Mach 2+ have to have this kind of overall form and same kind of technical solution. For experts Concorde and Tu-144 are VERY different <img src='http://googlesightseeing.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raph</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/09/20/konkordski/#comment-161275</link>
		<dc:creator>raph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 16:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/09/20/konkordski/#comment-161275</guid>
		<description>Peter, are you sure? I looked on the video and the plane's livery doesn't look like Aeroflot at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter, are you sure? I looked on the video and the plane&#8217;s livery doesn&#8217;t look like Aeroflot at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/09/20/konkordski/#comment-160951</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 20:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/09/20/konkordski/#comment-160951</guid>
		<description>Ralph -
Aeroflot was the only user.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ralph -<br />
Aeroflot was the only user.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raph</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/09/20/konkordski/#comment-160740</link>
		<dc:creator>Raph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/09/20/konkordski/#comment-160740</guid>
		<description>The Concorde was used by both Air France and British Airways. Was it the same thing for the TU-144? I mean, was it used by a specific airline (Aeroflot maybe)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Concorde was used by both Air France and British Airways. Was it the same thing for the TU-144? I mean, was it used by a specific airline (Aeroflot maybe)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Macartan Cassidy</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/09/20/konkordski/#comment-160727</link>
		<dc:creator>Macartan Cassidy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 14:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/09/20/konkordski/#comment-160727</guid>
		<description>I did want to point you to a place where Concorde and Konkordski can be seen side by side: The Technik Museum in Sinsheim, Germany (http://www.museum-sinsheim.de). However although I can see both planes together in the flesh, the Google Earth photos are hopelessly out of date :-(
Here's the Museum 
http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&#38;hl=en&#38;geocode=&#38;q=sinsheim&#38;sll=49.376551,8.667794&#38;sspn=0.012266,0.029182&#38;ie=UTF8&#38;ll=49.23924,8.897654&#38;spn=0.001538,0.003648&#38;t=k&#38;z=18&#38;iwloc=addr&#38;om=1
but unfortunately you don't see the planes yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did want to point you to a place where Concorde and Konkordski can be seen side by side: The Technik Museum in Sinsheim, Germany (http://www.museum-sinsheim.de). However although I can see both planes together in the flesh, the Google Earth photos are hopelessly out of date <img src='http://googlesightseeing.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Here&#8217;s the Museum<br />
Placemark: <a href="http://googlesightseeing.com/maps?p=1560&amp;c=160727&amp;f=q&amp;hl=en&amp;geocode=&amp;q=sinsheim&amp;sll=49.376551,8.667794&amp;sspn=0.012266,0.029182&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;ll=49.23924,8.897654&amp;spn=0.001538,0.003648&amp;t=k&amp;z=18&amp;iwloc=addr&amp;om=1" rel="nofollow">Google Maps</a> / <a href='http://googlesightseeing.com/gearth/comment/160727.kml'>Google Earth</a><br />
but unfortunately you don&#8217;t see the planes yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zbooy</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/09/20/konkordski/#comment-160694</link>
		<dc:creator>zbooy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 13:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/09/20/konkordski/#comment-160694</guid>
		<description>The feminine form certainly would _not_ be "Konkordcki", but "Konkordzka" (Polish) or "Konkordskaya" (Russian).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The feminine form certainly would _not_ be &#8220;Konkordcki&#8221;, but &#8220;Konkordzka&#8221; (Polish) or &#8220;Konkordskaya&#8221; (Russian).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
