<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Konkordski</title>
	<atom:link href="http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/09/20/konkordski/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/09/20/konkordski/</link>
	<description>Why bother seeing the world for real?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 13:53:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/09/20/konkordski/comment-page-1/#comment-198534</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:16:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/09/20/konkordski/#comment-198534</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;Ouchebny&quot; on russian is Educational.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Samara-Ouchebny Research Institute &gt; Samara Research and Education Institute.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Ouchebny&#8221; on russian is Educational.</p>

<p>Samara-Ouchebny Research Institute &gt; Samara Research and Education Institute.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BrunoCr</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/09/20/konkordski/comment-page-1/#comment-163447</link>
		<dc:creator>BrunoCr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 12:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/09/20/konkordski/#comment-163447</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;BTW there are 2 more Tu-144  viewable in Yahoo in Zhukowskitest base ;)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;FlashEarth direct link : -&gt; http://www.flashearth.com/?lat=55.570771&amp;lon=38.153327&amp;z=16.5&amp;r=0&amp;src=yh&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW there are 2 more Tu-144  viewable in Yahoo in Zhukowskitest base <img src='http://googlesightseeing.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>

<p>FlashEarth direct link : -&gt; <a href="http://www.flashearth.com/?lat=55.570771&amp;lon=38.153327&amp;z=16.5&amp;r=0&amp;src=yh" rel="nofollow">http://www.flashearth.com/?lat=55.570771&amp;lon=38.153327&amp;z=16.5&amp;r=0&amp;src=yh</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BrunoCr</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/09/20/konkordski/comment-page-1/#comment-163445</link>
		<dc:creator>BrunoCr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 12:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/09/20/konkordski/#comment-163445</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Tu-144 has not been sold to any other company than Aeroflot. There was only 16 airworthy Tu-144 (1 prototype, 1 pre-prod and 14 prod). 2 crashed : one during a show in Le Bourget (as you said) and one during qualification flights.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Tu-144 has been in service from 1977 to 1978 with passengers and from 1975 to 1980 for cargo.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And the story of the espionage has been contradicted even by Mr Turcat, chief test pilot on Concorde...
The fact is that a 100 passengers plane flying at Mach 2+ have to have this kind of overall form and same kind of technical solution. For experts Concorde and Tu-144 are VERY different ;)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tu-144 has not been sold to any other company than Aeroflot. There was only 16 airworthy Tu-144 (1 prototype, 1 pre-prod and 14 prod). 2 crashed : one during a show in Le Bourget (as you said) and one during qualification flights.</p>

<p>Tu-144 has been in service from 1977 to 1978 with passengers and from 1975 to 1980 for cargo.</p>

<p>And the story of the espionage has been contradicted even by Mr Turcat, chief test pilot on Concorde&#8230;
The fact is that a 100 passengers plane flying at Mach 2+ have to have this kind of overall form and same kind of technical solution. For experts Concorde and Tu-144 are VERY different <img src='http://googlesightseeing.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raph</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/09/20/konkordski/comment-page-1/#comment-161275</link>
		<dc:creator>raph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 16:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/09/20/konkordski/#comment-161275</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Peter, are you sure? I looked on the video and the plane&#039;s livery doesn&#039;t look like Aeroflot at all.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter, are you sure? I looked on the video and the plane&#8217;s livery doesn&#8217;t look like Aeroflot at all.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/09/20/konkordski/comment-page-1/#comment-160951</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 20:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/09/20/konkordski/#comment-160951</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ralph -
Aeroflot was the only user.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ralph -
Aeroflot was the only user.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raph</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/09/20/konkordski/comment-page-1/#comment-160740</link>
		<dc:creator>Raph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/09/20/konkordski/#comment-160740</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The Concorde was used by both Air France and British Airways. Was it the same thing for the TU-144? I mean, was it used by a specific airline (Aeroflot maybe)?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Concorde was used by both Air France and British Airways. Was it the same thing for the TU-144? I mean, was it used by a specific airline (Aeroflot maybe)?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Macartan Cassidy</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/09/20/konkordski/comment-page-1/#comment-160727</link>
		<dc:creator>Macartan Cassidy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 14:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/09/20/konkordski/#comment-160727</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I did want to point you to a place where Concorde and Konkordski can be seen side by side: The Technik Museum in Sinsheim, Germany (http://www.museum-sinsheim.de). However although I can see both planes together in the flesh, the Google Earth photos are hopelessly out of date :-(
Here&#039;s the Museum 
http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&amp;hl=en&amp;geocode=&amp;q=sinsheim&amp;sll=49.376551,8.667794&amp;sspn=0.012266,0.029182&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;ll=49.23924,8.897654&amp;spn=0.001538,0.003648&amp;t=k&amp;z=18&amp;iwloc=addr&amp;om=1
but unfortunately you don&#039;t see the planes yet.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did want to point you to a place where Concorde and Konkordski can be seen side by side: The Technik Museum in Sinsheim, Germany (<a href="http://www.museum-sinsheim.de)" rel="nofollow">http://www.museum-sinsheim.de)</a>. However although I can see both planes together in the flesh, the Google Earth photos are hopelessly out of date <img src='http://googlesightseeing.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> 
Here&#8217;s the Museum 
Placemark: <a href="http://googlesightseeing.com/maps?p=1560&amp;c=160727&amp;f=q&amp;hl=en&amp;geocode=&amp;q=sinsheim&amp;sll=49.376551,8.667794&amp;sspn=0.012266,0.029182&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;ll=49.23924,8.897654&amp;spn=0.001538,0.003648&amp;t=k&amp;z=18&amp;iwloc=addr&amp;om=1" rel="nofollow">Google Maps</a> / <a href='http://googlesightseeing.com/gearth/comment/160727.kml'>Google Earth</a>
but unfortunately you don&#8217;t see the planes yet.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zbooy</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/09/20/konkordski/comment-page-1/#comment-160694</link>
		<dc:creator>zbooy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 13:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/09/20/konkordski/#comment-160694</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The feminine form certainly would &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; be &quot;Konkordcki&quot;, but &quot;Konkordzka&quot; (Polish) or &quot;Konkordskaya&quot; (Russian).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The feminine form certainly would <em>not</em> be &#8220;Konkordcki&#8221;, but &#8220;Konkordzka&#8221; (Polish) or &#8220;Konkordskaya&#8221; (Russian).</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!--
This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 3/17 queries in 0.060 seconds using memcached

Served from: satellitesightseeing.com @ 2010-03-16 14:39:51 -->