<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pontcysyllte Aqueduct</title>
	<atom:link href="http://googlesightseeing.com/2009/07/07/pontcysyllte-aqueduct/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2009/07/07/pontcysyllte-aqueduct/</link>
	<description>Why bother seeing the world for real?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:32:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Skye</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2009/07/07/pontcysyllte-aqueduct/comment-page-1/#comment-206292</link>
		<dc:creator>Skye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 13:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/?p=7661#comment-206292</guid>
		<description>Where should you park if you are going to visit the Aqueduct?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where should you park if you are going to visit the Aqueduct?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2009/07/07/pontcysyllte-aqueduct/comment-page-1/#comment-206118</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 11:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/?p=7661#comment-206118</guid>
		<description>Mae&#039;n ddrwg gen i ond...

What Jel says makes no more sense than suggesting &quot;th&quot; for &quot;ll&quot;.  It comes from someone who obviously knows nothing about Welsh phonetics and apparently does not speak Welsh (as you can tell from his very first sentence).  Ignore it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mae&#8217;n ddrwg gen i ond&#8230;</p>
<p>What Jel says makes no more sense than suggesting &#8220;th&#8221; for &#8220;ll&#8221;.  It comes from someone who obviously knows nothing about Welsh phonetics and apparently does not speak Welsh (as you can tell from his very first sentence).  Ignore it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jel</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2009/07/07/pontcysyllte-aqueduct/comment-page-1/#comment-206101</link>
		<dc:creator>Jel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 08:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/?p=7661#comment-206101</guid>
		<description>Mae flin &#039;da fi, ond...
Sorry to say so, but phonetic transliterations from Welsh don&#039;t work, as you are bound to get the emphasis in the wrong place and the sounds you transcribed are just plain wrong. 
For many centuries, Welsh was spelled phonetically using the English alphabet and sound set as a basis, but adapting it where necessary. That they keep the doubled consonants and mutation elision of consonant pairs is deliberate, because the sounds are recognisably different - they were pushed to change, but have good reasons in the language not to do so.
To take that transcription of the w in dwr as oo, for example: it&#039;s actually more like oouw, depending on the region you&#039;re from a bit. The ph is a mutated p resulting from the concatenation of tra - crossing - and pont - bridge, which results in a sound with a hint of a v in it, the ph doing its best to become an f which is pronounced as a hard v, but in either case a certain distance from the soft ff you propose.
You&#039;d do better to point Alex in the direction of a decent Welsh pronouncer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mae flin &#8216;da fi, ond&#8230;<br />
Sorry to say so, but phonetic transliterations from Welsh don&#8217;t work, as you are bound to get the emphasis in the wrong place and the sounds you transcribed are just plain wrong.<br />
For many centuries, Welsh was spelled phonetically using the English alphabet and sound set as a basis, but adapting it where necessary. That they keep the doubled consonants and mutation elision of consonant pairs is deliberate, because the sounds are recognisably different &#8211; they were pushed to change, but have good reasons in the language not to do so.<br />
To take that transcription of the w in dwr as oo, for example: it&#8217;s actually more like oouw, depending on the region you&#8217;re from a bit. The ph is a mutated p resulting from the concatenation of tra &#8211; crossing &#8211; and pont &#8211; bridge, which results in a sound with a hint of a v in it, the ph doing its best to become an f which is pronounced as a hard v, but in either case a certain distance from the soft ff you propose.<br />
You&#8217;d do better to point Alex in the direction of a decent Welsh pronouncer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobK</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2009/07/07/pontcysyllte-aqueduct/comment-page-1/#comment-206093</link>
		<dc:creator>RobK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 10:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/?p=7661#comment-206093</guid>
		<description>Alex - just in case you ever do have to say it out loud, that&#039;s &quot;Traffont Thoor* Pont-kuh-SUTH-teh&quot;. Roughly. The double L is the tricky part - if you have to wipe your chin afterwards then you&#039;re doing it right ;)

* with a hard &quot;th&quot; as in &quot;them&quot;, and a long &quot;oo&quot; sound</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex &#8211; just in case you ever do have to say it out loud, that&#8217;s &#8220;Traffont Thoor* Pont-kuh-SUTH-teh&#8221;. Roughly. The double L is the tricky part &#8211; if you have to wipe your chin afterwards then you&#8217;re doing it right <img src='http://googlesightseeing.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>* with a hard &#8220;th&#8221; as in &#8220;them&#8221;, and a long &#8220;oo&#8221; sound</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Turnbull</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2009/07/07/pontcysyllte-aqueduct/comment-page-1/#comment-206088</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Turnbull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 20:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/?p=7661#comment-206088</guid>
		<description>At the start of the 20th century, small commercial canals like this were made obsolete by roads, and many of the UK&#039;s canals fell into total decay during this period.

It was only thanks to the birth of the canal leisure industry in the latter part of the century that any like this survive at all. In the 70s canals were restored by volunteers, and today &quot;there are more boats on the canals than at the height of the use of canals for commercial purposes&quot;.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_British_canal_system</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the start of the 20th century, small commercial canals like this were made obsolete by roads, and many of the UK&#8217;s canals fell into total decay during this period.</p>
<p>It was only thanks to the birth of the canal leisure industry in the latter part of the century that any like this survive at all. In the 70s canals were restored by volunteers, and today &#8220;there are more boats on the canals than at the height of the use of canals for commercial purposes&#8221;.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_British_canal_system" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_British_canal_system</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith T.</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2009/07/07/pontcysyllte-aqueduct/comment-page-1/#comment-206086</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/?p=7661#comment-206086</guid>
		<description>Seems like it&#039;s a tourist attraction these days where presumably it was originally intended for cargo or other deliveries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like it&#8217;s a tourist attraction these days where presumably it was originally intended for cargo or other deliveries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2009/07/07/pontcysyllte-aqueduct/comment-page-1/#comment-206084</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 14:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/?p=7661#comment-206084</guid>
		<description>Not true Peter, there are lots of water &quot;crossroads&quot;, for example:

http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/09/26/a-canal-across-germany/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not true Peter, there are lots of water &#8220;crossroads&#8221;, for example:</p>
<p><a href="http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/09/26/a-canal-across-germany/" rel="nofollow">http://googlesightseeing.com/2007/09/26/a-canal-across-germany/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2009/07/07/pontcysyllte-aqueduct/comment-page-1/#comment-206083</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 12:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/?p=7661#comment-206083</guid>
		<description>probably the only &#039;map&#039; with rivers having a &#039;cross-roads&#039; pattern google wont make a symbol for that ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>probably the only &#8216;map&#8217; with rivers having a &#8216;cross-roads&#8217; pattern google wont make a symbol for that <img src='http://googlesightseeing.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
