<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mount Everest no longer world&#8217;s highest mountain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://googlesightseeing.com/2010/02/mount-everest-no-longer-worlds-highest-mountain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2010/02/mount-everest-no-longer-worlds-highest-mountain/</link>
	<description>Why bother seeing the world for real?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 21:07:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay-ar</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2010/02/mount-everest-no-longer-worlds-highest-mountain/comment-page-1/#comment-208869</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay-ar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 09:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/?p=11040#comment-208869</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Like it..Like It...hahahaha ^_^&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like it..Like It&#8230;hahahaha ^_^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NISHA JOSHI</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2010/02/mount-everest-no-longer-worlds-highest-mountain/comment-page-1/#comment-208843</link>
		<dc:creator>NISHA JOSHI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 15:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/?p=11040#comment-208843</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I ACEPAT HIGHT PEAK  WHICH ANNAPURA IN NEPAL?
 26.246FT.
 NEXT 28.000FT. IN EVREST?.................&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I ACEPAT HIGHT PEAK  WHICH ANNAPURA IN NEPAL?
 26.246FT.
 NEXT 28.000FT. IN EVREST?&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Hannigan</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2010/02/mount-everest-no-longer-worlds-highest-mountain/comment-page-1/#comment-208801</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Hannigan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 12:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/?p=11040#comment-208801</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Here&#039;s one to make your head hurt...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Everest is higher in our atmosphere, but Chimborazo is closer to space! :D&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s one to make your head hurt&#8230;</p>

<p>Everest is higher in our atmosphere, but Chimborazo is closer to space! <img src='http://googlesightseeing.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: isacki</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2010/02/mount-everest-no-longer-worlds-highest-mountain/comment-page-1/#comment-208800</link>
		<dc:creator>isacki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 08:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/?p=11040#comment-208800</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;Everest is the highest point on earth, there’s no question about that.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This very question is the crux of the article! You are using the definition of height as above a surface. But this definition is compromised if the surface itself has varying height! Hence Everest is the highest point above a lower part of the Earth&#039;s surface, but the Ecuadorian mountain is on a higher part of the Earth&#039;s surface and thus is higher, if height is taken as distance from the centre of the Earth.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This definition is defined in reference to a fixed point (the centre) and is not contingent on the local surface. To my mind this makes it plainly more robust.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Everest is the highest point on earth, there’s no question about that.&#8221;</p>

<p>This very question is the crux of the article! You are using the definition of height as above a surface. But this definition is compromised if the surface itself has varying height! Hence Everest is the highest point above a lower part of the Earth&#8217;s surface, but the Ecuadorian mountain is on a higher part of the Earth&#8217;s surface and thus is higher, if height is taken as distance from the centre of the Earth.</p>

<p>This definition is defined in reference to a fixed point (the centre) and is not contingent on the local surface. To my mind this makes it plainly more robust.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Hannigan</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2010/02/mount-everest-no-longer-worlds-highest-mountain/comment-page-1/#comment-208799</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Hannigan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/?p=11040#comment-208799</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Great points between both Craig and MichaelOak. It all really depends on how you measure it. The modern society has adopted sea level as the world&#039;s datum, so Everest is crowned the highest. Climbers tend to agree because the atmosphere follows the curvature of the Earth, and Everest requires a LOT more oxygen than say Chimborazo.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great points between both Craig and MichaelOak. It all really depends on how you measure it. The modern society has adopted sea level as the world&#8217;s datum, so Everest is crowned the highest. Climbers tend to agree because the atmosphere follows the curvature of the Earth, and Everest requires a LOT more oxygen than say Chimborazo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Hannigan</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2010/02/mount-everest-no-longer-worlds-highest-mountain/comment-page-1/#comment-208798</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Hannigan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/?p=11040#comment-208798</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think it depends on whether you stop at sea level or not. Mauna Kea is &quot;taller&quot; from peak to base because the bottom of the mountain is the Pacific ocean floor. Mount McKinley I believe is the tallest mountain with a base above sea level.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it depends on whether you stop at sea level or not. Mauna Kea is &#8220;taller&#8221; from peak to base because the bottom of the mountain is the Pacific ocean floor. Mount McKinley I believe is the tallest mountain with a base above sea level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Hannigan</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2010/02/mount-everest-no-longer-worlds-highest-mountain/comment-page-1/#comment-208797</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Hannigan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/?p=11040#comment-208797</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The moon is mentioned more for visual purposes. How about the distance from peak to center of the Earth instead?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The moon is mentioned more for visual purposes. How about the distance from peak to center of the Earth instead?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Hannigan</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2010/02/mount-everest-no-longer-worlds-highest-mountain/comment-page-1/#comment-208796</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Hannigan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/?p=11040#comment-208796</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well yes that&#039;s how it&#039;s measured, but is sea level really the best datum if it&#039;s inconsistent around the planet?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well yes that&#8217;s how it&#8217;s measured, but is sea level really the best datum if it&#8217;s inconsistent around the planet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Hannigan</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2010/02/mount-everest-no-longer-worlds-highest-mountain/comment-page-1/#comment-208795</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Hannigan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 15:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/?p=11040#comment-208795</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;To me, there is a big difference between the &quot;highest&quot; mountain in the world and the &quot;tallest&quot; mountain in the world. The tallest mountain (to me) is the one that has the greatest distance from base to peak, regardless of sea level. The highest mountain can be measured by either sea level or distance from the core, whichever you prefer.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me, there is a big difference between the &#8220;highest&#8221; mountain in the world and the &#8220;tallest&#8221; mountain in the world. The tallest mountain (to me) is the one that has the greatest distance from base to peak, regardless of sea level. The highest mountain can be measured by either sea level or distance from the core, whichever you prefer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Smith</title>
		<link>http://googlesightseeing.com/2010/02/mount-everest-no-longer-worlds-highest-mountain/comment-page-1/#comment-208752</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 22:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlesightseeing.com/?p=11040#comment-208752</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Since when has height on earth been defined as proximity to the moon&#039;s surface?  The is the geophysical equivalent of a word game.  Downright silly.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since when has height on earth been defined as proximity to the moon&#8217;s surface?  The is the geophysical equivalent of a word game.  Downright silly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 9/24 queries in 0.014 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 414/430 objects using memcached

Served from: googlesightseeing.com @ 2012-05-26 01:48:29 -->
