Google Sightseeing takes you on tour of the world as seen from satellite, using the free Google Earth program, or Google Maps in your web browser. Each weekday your guides James and Alex present new weird and wonderful sights as suggested by readers.

The editors: James & Alex

Planes In Flight Mega-Post

Wednesday, 13th April 2005 by Alex

Please note that some or all of the objects mentioned in this post are no longer visible on Google Earth or Google Maps.

Well it’s my own fault really. Since I posted that I hadn’t seen any planes in flight, we have been absolutely inundated with submissions proving that I was completely wrong. Glad to hear it, ‘cos some of these are really cool.

  • Ryan (Cool shadow - look about 4 plane widths west)
  • nowak (Can you find the shadow? I think its all the way over here)
  • Arvo Huru (Anyone know what kind of plane that is?)
  • Eric Thelin
  • Brian Lalor
  • Miker
  • Chris (Pink plane. You sure its not parked though? I can’t see a shadow anywhere!)
  • Matt (From the comments - Three at once! Very cool but is it really three planes, or just one?)
  • Geoff Sulcer (Tiny little one)
  • Jason (This is the one in our first picture)
  • Colin (This one is huge! Or perhaps just very high up…)
  • Tobic (Another three planes?! One just off the top and another just off the bottom)
  • Kent (Kent says this is a U2 spyplane!)
  • josh k (Quite a few of the planes have this weird blue ‘ghost’ in addition to their shadows, perhaps its due to their speed…)
  • caknuck (…or perhaps its a reflection?)
  • Arvo Huru (Now that’s fast!)
  • Stilt (Apparently this is over Graceland)
  • Rod Levin (This is the one in our second picture)
  • Tom (This is cool, its a razor sharp image. Can’t find the shadow though.)
  • DDA (And finally… toy-town planes!)

Couple of extra plane related ones, first from punk floyd, who says that this is a SR-71 Blackbird Reconnaissance plane parked on Beale AFB, and also from Allen Ormond, who fittingly points us towards the Wright Brothers National Memorial in Kitty Hawk, North Carolina. This is where the Wright Brothers made the first powered airplane flight.

Flying 1 Flying 2

Many thanks to everyone who submitted links but didn’t get a mention, there were just far too many of you!

131 Responses to 'Planes In Flight Mega-Post'

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 »

  1. 1. franktjm says:

    Anybody notice this tiny plane in the Suisun Bay Reserve Fleet post?
    Placemark: Google Maps / Google Earth

  2. 2. Rob says:

    I doubt the pink plane is parked… it’s in the middle of a grassy field! No airport near by, either. Possible that it’s some kind of statue or monument or something, but I doubt it.

    As for the ghosting, I doubt that has anything to do with the speed… if it was caused by movement of the plane, then the ghost would likely be ahead or behind in the plane’s path… not off to the side. My money’s on some kind of parallax error (the satellite camera’s having focused on ground level, with the planes so high up above it).

    And it can’t possibly be a reflection. Water’s surface is too turbulent (waves) to reflect such a good image like that. Also, do you really think the desert would reflect a blue image like that? Doesn’t make any sense.

    I don’t think it can be explained away by any simple optics, it has to be some kind of processing error introduced by the satellites themselves.

  3. 3. Abu Zavi says:

    That’s not an SR-71 — it’s an MD-21. Close, but not the same, just a lesser known variant.

    Here — http://www.watership.net/nolan/albums/s100/md21.jpg — you can see the drone mounted, while in the Google shot, the drone is adjacent.

  4. 4. Empty says:

    How do you guys find those planes? Do you just zoom in on an airfield/airport and scroll around it? OR is there a freak out there who wrote a script looking for a specific shape on google maps…?

  5. 5. sb says:

    i think, this is the shadow of chris’ plane:
    Placemark: Google Maps / Google Earth

  6. 6. Paul says:

    The one “over Graceland” is not flying over Graceland. It’s Elvis’ private jet called “Lisa Marie” and it sits right next to the smaller “Hound Dog 2″ in the Graceland Visitor Center.

  7. 7. Scott says:

    Planes flying high enough won’t cast a visible shadow. (The sun isn’t a point light source, so as you get farther from the ground, you start to “eclipse” less and less of it from any given point.)

  8. 8. Kristie says:

    The pink plane (Northwest Airlines) is definitely not parked…I work in the building to the north (which explains how I found the plane, too). It’s on approach to Detroit Metropolitan Airport. If you zoom out 5 levels, the airport is in the southwest corner of the image.

  9. 9. mbcolbert says:

    No, the pink plane is not parked. It’s inbound to DTW, which is a few miles to the west. The plane is in fact flying almost directly of Ford Motor Company World Headquaters in Dearborn, MI:

    http://www.discoverdearborn.com/images/dearb_ford_lg.jpg

    It’s not pink, either. I looks like a Northwest Airlines MD-80. Detroit is a Northwest hub.

    I think the shadow is just crossing the highway about to pass over the Fairlane Mall, the big round blob on the west side of the highway.

  10. 10. Brad Clarke says:

    Placemark: Google Maps / Google Earth

    This is the Space and Rocket Center here in Huntsville, AL. It has an SR-71 parked out front as well as a few rockets and the Pathfinder “space shuttle test craft” (my non-technical term…go to the museum if you want the facts).

  11. 11. Frank says:

    Edwards Air Force Base

    Two Blackbirds are clearly visible, parked in front of a hanger…

    Placemark: Google Maps / Google Earth

  12. 12. Jack says:

    Avro Haru’s plane looks like a DC-9 type

  13. 13. Jack says:

    Maybe the blue shadow is an oversaturation of the camera due to reflected light. All the planes that show it look to be mostly bare Aluminum at high sun angles.

  14. 14. Nolan says:

    I think the blue “ghosts” are the shadows of the low-flying planes, but they’ve been retouched (lightened) to let people see what’s underneath.

  15. 15. Peter says:

    Another plane flying over a dam in southern CA.

    Placemark: Google Maps / Google Earth

  16. 16. The Compuations of AdamR :: Technology Edition says:

    Google Maps/Satellite - Weeee!

    Short entry, and a bit of an off-character post for me, but weee! I’m having a bit of strange fun with Google Maps and the combined satellite imagry. I am falt-out impressed by the speed of the application, especially the seemless dragging of the ima…

  17. 17. Richard says:

    Regarding the shot of three planes at once: I’d bet it is three separate planes, yes. The airport to the northwest of the plains is Logan International (BOS) in Boston, MA, and the planes are pretty clearly on approach. They run them in pretty close to each other — only about 40 or 45 seconds apart. (I used to live in South Boston, just SW of the airport, right under the approach to runway 4L. The planes are only about 700 feet up at that point, so it’s really pretty obvious when they go over.)

  18. 18. Richard says:

    (Sigh.) I feel like a bit of an idiot. First, yes, that should be “planes”, not “plains” in my previous post. Second, I’m responding to the *first* of the three-planes-in-one-shot, submitted by Matt, where the planes are coming in over the water. In the second of the three-in-one shots, submitted by Tobic, they’re pretty clearly taking off from DFW. If you scroll down to the southern end of the runway, you’ll see a bunch of planes lined up waiting to get cleared for takeoff. Again, it’s entirely plausible that they’d be spaced that closely.

  19. 19. David says:

    True, but if you look closely all 3 planes are identical, at least as far as is visible.

    Placemark: Google Maps / Google Earth
    Placemark: Google Maps / Google Earth
    Placemark: Google Maps / Google Earth

    There’s also another shot in the same region that supports the time-lapse theory:
    Placemark: Google Maps / Google Earth

    Notice the semi-visible wake in front of the boat; it looks like the boat would have moved forward in the time between shots, and then the tiles were partly overlapped.

  20. 20. caknuck says:

    How do you guys find those planes? Do you just zoom in on an airfield/airport and scroll around it? OR is there a freak out there who wrote a script looking for a specific shape on google maps…?

    I was taking a look at the Toronto Skydome and decided to check out the high-res portions of Lake Ontario surrounding it for planes and/or large boats.

    Having flown over the same airspace and on (more or less) the same course 4 years ago was an added bonus.

  21. 21. caknuck says:

    As for Tobic’s pic, that stretch of highway is part of my daily commute. (I work in a building just off I-635, two photo plates to the right of the linked image.) As you drive that stretch of freeway, landing planes buzz you at an altitude of 100-150′. Any closer and you’d be able to see the passengers through the cabin windows.

    But closer analysis of Tobic’s submission shows it is multiple images of the same plane. A second aircraft, a small private passenger plane, can be seen in the top right corner. If you scroll slightly up and right, you see the same craft again. Placemark: this shot / Google Earth shows the two duplicate images of both aircraft. Note the roughly equidistant spacing, which would suggest a slight time delay as the satellite camer panned northwards. You can also continue to scroll northwards and track the shadow of the larger passenger jet Placemark: as it flies over Lake Grapevine / Google Earth. The plane itself, however, is missing, meaning that the camera cropped it out (rotation of the Earth perhaps?)

  22. 22. caknuck says:

    Bugger. Placemark: Lake Grapevine shot / Google Earth.

  23. 23. Eric Hodel says:

    Sorry Abu Zavi, but that’s not an MD-21 in the picture there. The only one in existence is here:

    Placemark: Google Maps / Google Earth

    Underneath the glass of that building, the Museum of Flight in Seattle.

    MD-21 indicates that the has the D-21 drone mounted.

  24. 24. Peter says:

    I concur with the time-lapse theory for the “planes” on approach to Logan. If you look at the shadows of the “three” planes, they all point in slightly different directions suggesting that the satellite took three sucessive images of the same plane as it was going over the horizon thus at slightly different angles. Remember that satellites go really fast! ;) If it were three distinct planes taken at the same time, then the shadows would all align in the genrally same direction.

  25. 25. Jason Shellen says:

    I found Placemark: this small plane over Lake Tahoe / Google Earth.

    Placemark: Google Maps / Google Earth

  26. 26. Jack says:

    I think this image from the same area doe snot support the “time lapse” plus with the on-orbit speed your perspective will be way diferent if it were three different images. Notice on this image there is no “ghost wake”

    Placemark: Google Maps / Google Earth

  27. 27. Charlene says:

    Short final for runway 34 at Calgary:

    Placemark: Google Maps / Google Earth

  28. 28. Peter says:

    Jack - In fact your image helps to support the time-lapse theory since those ships would be traveling much slower than the airplane and thus was only captured in one frame whereas the plane was captured in three frames since it travels much faster. Further support to the time-lapse therory is that the satellite would be traveling overheard from west to east capturing the first image of the plane when it is the farthest out and thus the reason for the shadow at 3:00 o’clock. The two subsequent images of the plane as it approaches Logan would be captured as the satellite passed overhead and panned & scanned back to obtain other frames and thus the reason for the less oblique shadows at 2:30 PM and 2:00 PM.

  29. 29. Jack says:

    I would think the height of the aircraft has more to do with the distance from the plane to the shadow not the angle of the imager. look out the window next time you are in a plane that is landing, the shadow distance is a function of the height. Plus even if the angle of the satellite changed, the angle of the sun as reflected on the plane would not. so the shadow would not move. on top of that it would appear that we are looking at the planes from three different angles, which we are not. they all look like they are taken from the same perspective. another thing is that yes the boats are slower, but that dosent get around the fact that IF three pictures are taken they would have moved so it would like like a smudge, a composite of the three boats.

  30. 30. Kevin says:

    If you go due north of the U2taking off from Beale…past the SR-71…there’s another U2 circling around to the northwest.

    Placemark: Google Maps / Google Earth

  31. 31. Shanktified! says:

    Look how close they get in this atlanta approach. One appears to be touching down and the other is right over the parking lot.

    Placemark: Google Maps / Google Earth

  32. 32. Mignon says:

    I believe the shadow to Tom’s plane is just to the right of the field over which the plane is flying. I think I see the left wing and tail shadows on the slightly winding, lighter-colored road at the right side of the field. I think the rest of the shadow is mostly in hidden by trees and other shadows. I had to zoom in all the way to find it and it took a long time. It looks like most the shadows of buildings and trees are pointing left, so I didn’t think to look to the right.

  33. 33. NRCody says:

    This is us missing a seaplane taking off by just a bit.
    Placemark: Google Maps / Google Earth

    This is about five miles southeast of a “giant sundial” ;-)

  34. 34. Gayle O says:

    A jet leaving Vancouver, BC:

    Placemark: Google Maps / Google Earth

  35. 35. Joel says:

    In regards to the airplane ’shadows’, I’m pretty sure this is what’s happening: In astronomy (and I’m assuming satallite images of earth), photography is often done in black and white. This allows for finer detail pictures, and when it’s transferring data back to earth, there is a lot less data to send (only grayscale instead of colour). Now the trick is that you take the picture 3 times: once with a red filter, once with a blue filter, and once with a green filter, and then you can recombine them to get a natural-colour photograph, or close enough. So, if these pictures are taken at slightly different times, and the airplane was high enough, the perspective would be off enough to get weird shadowing effects with different coloured planes. That’s my theory.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 »

Leave a Reply

This form will auto-link URLs or you can use simple HTML, <a href="http://googlesightseeing.com">Like this</a>.

Link to specific places either as a Google Maps page or a decimal latitude and longitude written like this: lat/lng:55.949400,-3.200000.

If you've found an unrelated sight that you think should be posted in its own entry then use the suggestion form!